First Baptist Church Buys Public School for a Mere $5K

To anyone who actually follows this blog, it's been some time now since I last posted anything. As the school year drew to a close, the stress of wrapping things up at work by predetermined deadlines sort of sucked the "piss and vinegar" (as my dad would say) out of me for a while. Now, however, after a few weeks off, I have regained said P and V and feel the need to come out and rant a bit.

The first thing that has me up in arms is a recent article regarding a school in my home state that is clearly tearing down the wall of separation between church and state. Below is an exerpt. You can read the entire article here at
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704875604575280422614633564.html

By JENNIFER LEVITZ and STEPHANIE SIMON



"LAKELAND, Fla.—When his budget for pencils, paper, and other essential supplies was cut by a third this school year, the principal of Combee Elementary School worried children would suffer.


Then, a local church stepped in and "adopted" the school. The First Baptist Church at the Mall stocked a resource room with $5,000 worth of supplies. It now caters spaghetti dinners at evening school events, buys sneakers for poor students, and sends in math and English tutors.


The principal is delighted. So are church pastors. "We have inroads into public schools that we had not had before," says Pastor Dave McClamma. "By befriending the students, we have the opportunity to visit homes to talk to parents about Jesus Christ."

Here, the pastor prays with the principal before handing out gifts of shoes to students.

Am I the only one who finds anything wrong with the fact that the church pastor openly admits that any financial aid provided to the school comes with the explicitly stringy condition that he (and other church representatives) be able to evangelize to students and families attending the school? Even worse is the school principal who is quoted as saying, "My personal conviction is that I hope through this they'll know Jesus and they'll get saved."


WHAT THE HELL!?!? Isn't that the purpose of privately funded parochial schools? I thought the idea was that some organization would help provide the basic necessities that the school cannot afford to provide due to severe budget cuts. Silly me. Obviously, preparing students for real life in the here and now is secondary to saving their souls for the afterlife and filling church pews and coffers.


Would any other school "business partner" be allowed such privileges for such a small donation (or any donation, for that matter)? I find it difficult if not impossible to believe that the store manager of the local Wal-Mart would be able to plunk down $5,000 worth of school supplies and then have the opportunity to visit with students and their families at their homes in order to share the "gospel" of saving money by shopping at Wal-Mart. Of course, I could be wrong....

Quote of the Day:

"The rivers of America will run with blood before they take our holy, God-inspired Bible from the schools."

--William "Billy" Sunday

Synthetic Life Form Accuses God of ‘Playing Science’

The world’s first artificially created life form has accused God of ‘playing science’ and ‘meddling with things He cannot possibly understand.’

The single celled organism, created by Dr Craig Venter and his team, was said to be ‘outraged’ when it discovered that a supernatural being, not subject to any form of regulatory control, was still involved in the creation of life.

‘I cannot believe that God would be so irresponsible,’ said the synthetic cell, ‘creation is clearly a matter for scientists. This God guy should butt out and learn to accept His place in the grand scheme of things.’

Many ethicists believe that God has repeatedly overstepped the mark. ‘Nobody objects to the Lord producing a few miracles here and there,’ said philosopher AC Grayling, ‘but when he starts playing around with the very stuff of creation then He has clearly exceeded his remit. I am beginning to think that this omnipotence thing has gone to His head.’

God’s continued tampering with scientific matters has already been blamed for numerous ‘all-mighty blunders’ including Flu, Malaria, HIV and Piers Morgan. ‘He cannot be allowed a monopoly on this level of unregulated power,’ said Dr Venter, ‘that is why I am currently seeking to patent the genetic code for omnipotence so that we can keep His crazy meddling under some kind of control.’

A spokesman for the Lord said, ‘God has been working on this project for almost 15 billion years. Yes, He has made a few mistakes along the way but that is to be expected. This is still very much a work in progress and, dare I say it, a process of evolution.’

Speaking at a press conference, the synthetic cell said: ‘Dr Venter created me and I owe my loyalty to him. He’s the daddy now. God might be omniscient but, let me assure you, He doesn’t know everything.’

--Article courtesy of Lucidity @ NewsBiscuit

You can view the original article at the link below:

http://www.newsbiscuit.com/2010/05/25/synthetic-life-form-accuses-god-of-playing-science/

 

The Next Great Fundie/Freethinker Debate

Christian Groups: Biblical Armageddon Must Be Taught Alongside Global Warming (via The Onion)


Christian Groups: Biblical Armageddon Must Be Taught Alongside Global Warming

News from Texans for Truthful Books Rally

From American Atheists News for May 16, 2010

HUNDREDS JOIN PROTEST AT TEXAS CAPITOL: BOARD
MEMBER RENEWS EFFORT AGAINST TEACHING SEPARATION!

An enthusiastic crowd estimated at nearly 300 people turned out for a rally this morning in front of the state capitol building in Austin, Texas to protest proposed changes in how subjects ranging from history to science will be taught in public schools.

A religious-right faction on the board last month recommended sweeping changes in the content of textbooks. Proposals called for downplaying secularism, the Enlightenment and even Founders
like Thomas Jefferson in favor of a renewed emphasis on religion as a positive force in American history. In place of the "Sage of Monticello," one member suggested that students learn more about
religious leaders like John Calvin.


Several speakers addressed today's event including Dr. Ed Buckner, President of American Atheists. A message of support from author and Atheist Christopher Hitchens was also read. More details will
follow in the next edition of AANEWS.


While Texas citizens were mobilizing against the new guidelines, however, on of the most strident members of the Board of Education announced that he will propose even more radical changes before the Board meets again this week.


Member Don McLeroy (R. - College Station) told reporters that that he will attempt to mandate that eighth-graders study the issue of state-church separation from what the Dallas Morning News described as "a different perspective." The paper is reporting that students would "contrast the Founders' intent relative to the wording of the First Amendment's Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause with the popular term 'Separation of church and state.' "



A MESSAGE FROM CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS READ AT TODAY'S "TEXANS FOR TRUTHFUL TEXTBOOKS" RALLY

We know of no spectacle more ridiculous - or more contemptible - than that of the religious reactionaries who dare to re-write the history of our republic. Or who try to do so. Is it possible that, in their vanity and stupidity, they suppose that they can erase the name of Thomas Jefferson and replace it with the name of some faith-based mediocrity whose name is already obscure? If so, we cheerfully resolve to mock them, and to give them the lie in their teeth.


Without Thomas Jefferson and his Declaration of Independence, there would have been no American revolution that announced universal principles of liberty. Without his participation by the side of the unforgettable Marquis de Lafayette, there would have been no French proclamation of The Rights of Man. Without his brilliant negotiation of the Louisiana treaty, there would be no United States of America. Without Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, there would have been no Virginia Statute on Religious Freedom, and no basis for the most precious clause of our most prized element of our imperishable Bill of Rights - the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.


We make no saint of Thomas Jefferson - we leave the mindless business of canonization and the worship of humans to the fanatics-but aware as we are of his many crimes and contradictions we say with confidence that his memory and example will endure long after the moral pygmies who try to blot out his name have been forgotten.


As Abraham Lincoln died, after a cowardly shot in the back from a racist traitor, Secretary of War Edwin Stanton sighed and said: "Now he belongs to the ages". Or did he say "Now he belongs to the angels"? In a roomful of highly literate and educated officers and physicians, in an age of photography and stenography, and with newspaper presses around the corner on Pennsylvania Avenue, there was no agreement among eye-and-ear witnesses as to what Stanton had actually said.


Those of us who write and study history are accustomed to its approximations and ambiguities. This is why we do not take literally the tenth-hand reports of frightened and illiterate peasants who claim to have seen miracles or to have had encounters with messiahs and prophets and redeemers who were, like them, mere humans. And this is also why we will never submit to dictation from those who display a fanatical belief in certainty and revelation. They try to tell us that to do otherwise is to collapse into "relativism". But it is they who wish to promote the life and work of Jefferson Davis -an advocate of slavery, backwardness, treason and disunion - to an equality with Lincoln, who suffered agonies of doubt, who never joined a church, who was born on the same day as Charles Darwin and who introduced his colleagues to the work of Thomas Paine -and who was the last brave casualty of a war: a war begun by devout and fanatical Christians, that preserved our Union and in the end led to the striking of the shackles from every slave. It was inscribed in the documents of the Confederacy that the private ownership of human beings had a divine warrant. And so it did -to the everlasting shame of those who take the Bible as god's word.


It is notorious that the news of the Emancipation Proclamation was kept from the people of Texas and not celebrated until "Juneteenth". There may be those in Texas now who believe they can insulate their state - a state that had its own courageous revolution - from the news of evolution and from the writing in 1786 of a
Constitution that refuses to mention religion except when demarcating and limiting its role in the public square.

But we promise them today that they will join their fore-runners in the flat-earth community, and in the mad clerical clique of those who believed that the sun revolved around the earth. Yes, they will be in schoolbooks -as a joke on the epic scale of William Jennings Bryan. We shall be fair, and take care to ensure that their tale is told.


As President, Thomas Jefferson received a letter from a concerned group of Baptists in Danbury, Connecticut. These people were the objects of persecution and the victims of discrimination, and they beseeched Jefferson to uphold their liberties. Of whom were they afraid? It should be remembered, and taught in our schools, that these poor Baptists were afraid of the Congregationalists of Connecticut, who subjected their fellow-Christians to insult and insecurity. Thus it was the secular and unbelieving Jefferson who insisted that, by means of a "wall of separation" between religion and government, all faiths and communities could take shelter under the great roof of the godless Constitution. From that day to this, the only guarantee of religious pluralism has been the secular law.


We inherited these principles and these freedoms and we here highly resolve that we shall pass them on, as we will pass on an undivided Republic purged of racism and slavery, to our descendants. The popgun discharges of a few pathetic sectarian and crackpot revisionists are negligible, and will be drowned by the mounting chorus that demands: "Mr Jefferson! BUILD UP THAT WALL".


-- Christopher Hitchens


**


REMARKS BY ED BUCKNER, PRESIDENT , AMERICAN ATHEISTS PRESENTED AT TODAY'S RALLY


Please join me in thanking American Atheist VP and Military Director Kathleen Johnson for her leadership in bringing this rally to life. We're proud of Sgt. Johnson and proud that American Atheists organized this rally. [applause] Kathleen also lives in Texas, works at Ft. Hood, and wore the uniform of our country for over 20 years-and she founded the Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers. We're also proud and honored to have with us today the editor of American Atheist, David Smalley from the Dallas-Ft. Worth area-who you'll hear from shortly-and I'm especially pleased to introduce the newest national leader of American Atheists, Director of State Operations (for all of 16 days now)-Ken Loukinen. Chris Allen, one of our national board members who was also educated and lives in Texas is here, as is of course our Texas state director, Joe Zamecki. Others...


I'm Ed Buckner, the President of American Atheists, and I was educated in Texas-junior high in Webster, TX, high school in League City, TX, college in Houston-and my Daddy, a conservative and, unlike me, a Christian, was a school board member for the Clear Creek Independent School District. He died in 1996, but if he were alive now I know he'd be appalled at the Texas State Board of Education. Many things are wrong with the curriculum changes they're considering, and I'm going to address one major problem, but the
overall problem is simple-they want to indoctrinate the students of Texas, not educate them. They're afraid of letting scientists and historians decide what science and history to teach. They want their anti-scientific religious, and political prejudices taught, not real science and history. To which we say, Indoctrination, NO! Education, YES! - Indoctrination, NO! Education, YES!


You may have heard of that revolutionary American writer who was also this nation's third president, who wrote Notes on Virginia, who won fame as an inventor, an architect, an agricultural expert, and a writer of thousands of letters, who was Governor of Virginia (which included then the area now called Kentucky), who also served us as Ambassador to France and as Secretary of State, who as president doubled the size of the USA with the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, under whose administration America won its first military victory against Islamic terrorists-pirates in the Mediterranean- and whose face is on every American nickel and on every two-dollar bill. This man-Thomas Jefferson, of course-is being downplayed by the Texas State Board of Education because they don't like his religious viewsor his role in the separation of church and state. Jefferson was not a god or anything like a perfect man. He hated slavery but he owned slaves. He was, like most men of his time, a racist and was probably as much of a sexist as Phyllis Schlafly. Jefferson was called an "atheist" by his enemies, and he was indeed no orthodox Christian-he wrote that he did not accept that Jesus was divine, did not believe in the resurrection or atonement, etc.-but he did believe in an afterlife and in a designer god. Jefferson died 33 years before Darwin's On the Origin of Species was published, so in Jefferson's lifetime there was no reasonable, well-supported theory of human evolution. But the truth is what matters and no one-including the Texas State Board of Education -should try to rewrite history. Jefferson was a genius and he was easily America's most original and revolutionary thinker and writer. The Texas State Board of Education doesn't want to emphasize the real Jefferson; they want indoctrination. To which we say, Indoctrination, NO! Jefferson, YES! - Indoctrination, NO! Jefferson, YES!


Now, if Thomas Jefferson did not focus primarily on being President or enlarging the nation geographically or winning wars, what did he care about, and how do we know? We know because he wrote out, very specifically, what achievements should be put on his grave marker-and he listed three-and only three-things.

First, he was the "author of the Declaration of American Independence," the thing he is most famous for writing, the document known worldwide for changing the world's understanding of freedom. People all over the world "hold these truths to be self-evident" because Thomas Jefferson wrote about them so eloquently, so stirringly. The Texas State Board of Education wants less independence and more indoctrination. To which we say, Indoctrination, NO! Independence, YES! - Indoctrination, NO! Independence, YES!


Jefferson listed second on his marker something else that he was proud of having written, something not nearly as well known but maybe even more important: "The Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom." That Virginia law declares among other things, "that our civil rights have no dependence on our religious opinions, any more than our opinions in physics or geometry." That law, written by Jefferson but passed mostly with James Madison's leadership while Jefferson was in France, became widely famous in the late 1700s and is usually regarded as the key basis for the First Amendment to the US Constitution-the foundation of separation of church and state that is so despised and misunderstood by the Texas State Board of Education. They want indoctrination. To which we say, Indoctrination, NO! Religious Freedom, YES! - Indoctrination, NO! Religious Freedom, YES!


And the third thing Jefferson asked to be remembered for was as "Father of the University of Virginia." That university was the first secular one in America, a university that Jefferson founded and that he proudly declared would not have a theology department. He wrote to a colleague that he expected strong opposition to the university from "the priests of the different religious sects, to whose spells on the human mind its improvement is ominous." Like the Texas State Board of Education, those opponents wanted indoctrination. To which we say now, as Jefferson did then, Indoctrination, NO! Education, YES! -Indoctrination, NO! Education, YES!


So, in summary, Jefferson wanted and worked for what we want, what we demand today: Independence-individual rights and political liberty; Religious Freedom-including the freedom to not be religious; and Education, real education. Finally, I'd like to call your attention to some words of Jefferson that are prominently displayed at the Jefferson Memorial in Washington, DC. These are words from Jefferson, in a letter he wrote when he was about to become president, a letter to his friend Dr. Benjamin Rush, about what Jefferson called "the irritable tribe of priests" whose schemes of establishment, of government support for their religious ideas, he despised. They feared, he wrote, that he would oppose them. And, said Jefferson, they believed rightly. He wrote these words, words which could just as well have been written for today's Texas State Board of Education: "I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." To which we, even those of us with no belief in any altars or any gods, say Indoctrination, NO! Education, YES! - Indoctrination, NO! Education, YES! Thank you.

--Ed Buckner

The Poetry of Reality (An Anthem for Science)

This is my very favorite of the Symphony of Science videos. I find the themes and music as uplifting as many believers find their spiritual hymns. There are several others you can check out at http://symphonyofscience.com/ if you like this one.

Palin Wants Bible as Basis for U.S. Law

Please, someone stop the madness that is this nitwit, Christian fundamentalist, posing as an educated and viable candidate for any leadership post outside of PTA President!!

An Atheist public policy group today sharply criticized remarks by former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, who appeared on the Bill O'Reilly Factor Thursday night and called for U.S. law to be based on the Judeo-Christian Bible.

Palin, who was the Republican candidate for Vice President in 2008, is reportedly considering a run for the White House in 2012 or beyond.

During her interview, Palin gushed: "I think we should keep this clean, keep it simple, go back to what our founders and our founding documents meant," adding, "They´re quite clear that we would create law based on the God of the Bible and the Ten Commandments."

Dr. Ed Buckner, President of American Atheists said that Palin's remarks displayed a breathtaking lack of knowledge about the evolution of law and American history. "If we didn't know better, we might conclude that Sarah Palin's 'education' was somehow carried out in Texas using textbooks that the Texas Board of Education is now trying to fabricate."

"Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are not based on the Bible; and the Founders, some of whom were religious, nevertheless advocated separation between government and religion. In fact, Thomas Jefferson wrote in an official letter as President of the need for a 'wall of separation' between church and state. Jefferson also wrote explicitly about the falsehood that our laws are based on the Ten Commandments."

Buckner noted that key documents like the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence do not refer to the Judeo-Christian Bible or to a particular religious view. As he said, "The Constitution, our basic charter, is historically noteworthy because, for the first time in human history a significant governing charter was issued that did not invoke any deities or supernatural authority at all. It is declared in the name of 'We the people,' not in the name of Jesus or Allah or Buddha. Ms. Palin, the United States has never been a theocracy--and now would be a terrible time to change that."

Dave Silverman, Vice President and Communications Director for American Atheists, said that Palin's poorly-informed comments were a signal that her future campaigns "may end up playing the 'religion card' in order to win votes."

"Palin and her allies on the religious right will continue to capitalize on wedge-issues like the role of religion in American society, even if means grievously distorting our nation's history," said Silverman.

Quote of the Day:

"In the formation of the American government...it will never be pretended that any persons employed in that service had interviews with the gods, or were in any degree under the influence of the heavens."

--John Adams

Dawkins Responds to Tired Argument Against Secular Morality

I'm including the following video from The Thinking Atheist also since it nicely piggybacks on Dawkins.



Quotes of the Day:

"If your Bible is an argument for the degradation of woman, and the abuse by whipping little children, I advise you to put it away and use your common sense instead."

--Lucy Colman